Nontraditional

I deploy this word as a tag on my blog for artists using materials in ways that one would have said, when I was in Art school, “that wasn’t how we were taught to use those in Art school.” Paint on canvas, pencil on paper, etc. Maybe I’ll switch to multimedia eventually…

The context for this observation is that I am in the early stages of working on glass- see below. Glass is definitely a nontraditional support for painting, for a couple of reasons that are obvious to me now- it’s the worst combination of heavy and fragile, and it’s definitely not a permanent substrate for water-based paints like acrylic (all you have to do is spritz it with water and the paint, even if dry, will rub right off). Regular readers will know that impermanence is just fine with me.

While landfill waste diversion isn’t a subject for this work, it is something that matters to me- all of my other installation work, whether the cubes or my recent interactive pieces, employ material reuse. In the later case not only are the cubes reused studies, the supports, including the foam core on which the cubes are mounted, are all upcycled– only the magnets and some “virgin” paint or media are first-use.

There are still themes/ideas of contradiction to work with- the contradiction of paint that appears to be free of a support; the layering of “sides” of the cubes which is undone by them being flat shapes rather than the edges of a solid viewed in perspective. Given my recent re-writing of my artist statement, I like adding another modality (another “and”) to my practice as well. I think eventually the sheets of glass will get stacked in a way that requires the viewer to move so that the cubes “edges” align- I’m intrigued, as a means to center contemplation, by strategies that highlight any requirement for the viewer to be present and engaged.

I am also taking time to revisit work by and words about artists who work with transparent supports- Nathalie Cohen, Helen Pashgian, Susan Meyer, Ivelisse Jiménez, Craig Kauffman, and in particular Ronald Davis and Sali Muller. If dear reader has suggestions I’d love to hear about them.