It probably tells the reader quite a bit about me to say that the image above makes me happy on so many levels.
I’ve made work in the past that was intended to be displayed under both black light and with no light (by utilizing photo-phosphorescent paint).
The study in the gallery above (the first of several*) is a recent continuation, or, at least, a related body of work. I’m working with adding paint on glass to create a layer of physical separation and also layering the different paints to see how they mix optically. I’ll probably use my updates to document progress.
An implied light source is important to understand the illusion in a painting, even in the case of an un-natural, fictitious space or place. I like the contradiction/duality of the work also appearing to be a source of light, in addition to the duality of having more than one appearance or set of visual characteristics, given a difference lighting. Plus, the need to change lighting requires participation, emphasizing the experiential element of seeing art; and, the additional duality that black-light art is not typically “high art” gives a gentle entry point for more audiences (I’m totally good with “that’s cool” from the non-art crowd).
*if you want to see others, sign up for this blog- I do post a lot about other artists, but I give updates on my own practice every other week as well.